Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
J. appl. oral sci ; 17(6): 570-573, Nov.-Dec. 2009. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-534421

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the glass transition temperature (Tg) and degree of conversion (DC) of a light-cured (Fill Magic) versus a chemically cured (Concise) orthodontic composite. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anelastic relaxation spectroscopy was used for the first time to determine the Tg of a dental composite, while the DC was evaluated by infrared spectroscopy. The light-cured composite specimens were irradiated with a commercial LED light-curing unit using different exposure times (40, 90 and 120 s). RESULTS: Fill Magic presented lower Tg than Concise (35-84ºC versus 135ºC), but reached a higher DC. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that Fill Magic has lower Tg than Concise due to its higher organic phase content, and that when this light-cured composite is used to bond orthodontic brackets, a minimum energy density of 7.8 J/cm² is necessary to reach adequate conversion level and obtain satisfactory adhesion.


Subject(s)
Humans , Composite Resins/chemistry , Glass/chemistry , Orthodontic Brackets , Resin Cements/chemistry , Transition Temperature , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Elastic Modulus , Energy Transfer , Friction , Glass/radiation effects , Hot Temperature , Light , Materials Testing , Polymers/chemistry , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Spectrum Analysis , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL